Election 2026
Thomas Sanchez showed up to vote at his usual polling place in Dallas on March 3, 2026. He was turned away and told to drive 6 miles to a different precinct. Hundreds of other voters got the same message. The county website crashed. Local GOP chairs had quietly switched to precinct-based voting two months earlier.
Texas Voters Lost Their Polling Places Overnight
In December 2025, local Republican Party chairs in Dallas and Williamson counties switched primary voting from countywide to precinct-based. The change forced voters to find a single assigned polling place instead of voting at any location in the county. Many voters had not received updated registration cards. The county's online lookup tool did not have accurate precinct assignments.
Dallas County had used countywide voting centers since 2010. Most voters had never needed to know their precinct number.
On primary day, the Dallas County Democratic Party received hundreds of calls from voters of both parties trying to find their new polling place. In Williamson County, one voter discovered their assigned precinct was 30 minutes away. At the Northstar Georgetown location, voters waited more than two hours. The confusion was severe enough that a judge extended polls to 9 PM in Dallas and 10 PM in Williamson. The Texas Supreme Court reversed both extensions.
Voters who cast ballots after 7 PM do not know if their votes were counted.
What happened in Dallas is one version of a pattern playing out across the country. The 2026 midterms face threats from five directions at once, and each one makes the others worse.
Five Ways Your Vote Is Under Attack
New state laws restrict who can vote and how. The federal government is rewriting mail voting rules. AI-powered propaganda is replacing detectable bots. Dark money is flooding races at record levels. And the people who run elections are leaving faster than they can be replaced.
- 32
- restrictive laws in 19 states since Jan 2025
- 4
- states cut mail ballot grace periods
- 0
- federal AI disclosure laws for elections
- $1.9B
- in dark money shaped 2024 races
- 36%
- election worker turnover since 2020
29 states let partisan legislatures draw their own district maps. That means the people who benefit from gerrymandered maps are the same people who draw them. The map below shows which states use independent commissions, which use advisory panels, and which let legislators choose their own voters.
Who Draws the Maps
- Partisan legislature draws maps
- Politician-led commission
- Independent commission
- Advisory commission
- Single district (at-large)
States in red let partisan legislatures draw maps with no independent check. Source: Voting Rights Lab, Brennan Center.
| State | Detail |
|---|---|
| Alabama | — |
| Alaska | One House seat, elected statewide. An independent board draws state legislative maps. |
| Arizona | Created by ballot measure (2000). |
| Arkansas | — |
| California | Created by ballot measure (2008/2010). The Brennan Center found that the independent commissions in Arizona, California, Colorado and Michigan drew 19% of congressional districts but 41% of 2024 toss-up districts. Proposition 50 (November 2025) replaced the commission map with a legislature-drawn map for the 2026 cycle. |
| Colorado | Created by ballot measure (2018). 4 Dem + 4 Rep + 4 no party. 21 hearings, 5,000+ public comments. |
| Connecticut | The legislature needs a two-thirds vote; a backup commission draws the map if it fails. |
| Delaware | — |
| District of Columbia | — |
| Florida | — |
| Georgia | — |
| Hawaii | A reapportionment commission chosen by legislative leaders draws the map. |
| Idaho | Bipartisan commission. 3 appointed by each party. |
| Illinois | The legislature draws the congressional map. Its backup commission covers state legislative maps only. |
| Indiana | The legislature draws the map, with a backup commission if it fails. |
| Iowa | Nonpartisan legislative staff draw maps without political data. Legislature votes yes or no. |
| Kansas | — |
| Kentucky | — |
| Louisiana | — |
| Maine | An advisory commission proposes a plan; the legislature needs a two-thirds vote. |
| Maryland | An advisory committee helps the governor draft a plan; the legislature decides. |
| Massachusetts | — |
| Michigan | Created by ballot measure (2018). 4 Dem + 4 Rep + 5 unaffiliated. |
| Minnesota | Courts frequently intervene when legislature deadlocks |
| Mississippi | The legislature draws the congressional map. Its backup commission covers state legislative maps only. |
| Missouri | Has bipartisan commission language but congressional maps drawn by legislature in practice |
| Montana | Districting and Apportionment Commission. Bipartisan with independent chair. |
| Nebraska | — |
| Nevada | — |
| New Hampshire | — |
| New Jersey | A commission named by party leaders, with a tiebreaker, draws the map. |
| New Mexico | — |
| New York | Independent commission. The legislature can override it by a supermajority. |
| North Carolina | Among the most extreme gerrymanders. R+26 efficiency gap in 2024 map. |
| North Dakota | One House seat, elected statewide. |
| Ohio | The legislature needs a bipartisan supermajority; if it fails, the Ohio Redistricting Commission of elected officials takes over. Courts repeatedly rejected maps in 2022. |
| Oklahoma | — |
| Oregon | — |
| Pennsylvania | The legislature draws the congressional map. A commission draws state legislative maps only. |
| Rhode Island | — |
| South Carolina | — |
| South Dakota | — |
| Tennessee | — |
| Texas | Legislative Redistricting Board as backup if legislature fails |
| Utah | An advisory commission created by ballot measure (2018) proposes maps. The legislature ignored them in 2021, and a court imposed a new map in 2025. |
| Vermont | — |
| Virginia | A commission of 8 legislators and 8 citizens (2020 amendment). It deadlocked in 2021, and the state supreme court drew the map. |
| Washington | Bipartisan commission. 2 appointed by each party + nonvoting chair. |
| West Virginia | — |
| Wisconsin | Among the most gerrymandered states. Governor used veto to force court-drawn maps in 2024. |
| Wyoming | — |
Ten states are redrawing maps before 2030, outside the normal census cycle. Texas alone is targeting 5 additional seats. California and Virginia responded by redrawing their own maps through ballot measures. The net effect is an estimated 10 seats that will change hands purely through redistricting, before a single voter makes a choice.
Gerrymandering decides who governs. The remaining three attacks work together: mail ballot restrictions make voting physically harder, AI propaganda erodes trust in the results, and dark money funds the candidates who pass the laws.
How 46 Million Mail Voters Lost Their Safety Net
46 million Americans voted by mail in 2024. For elderly voters, people with disabilities, rural residents without nearby polling places, and hourly workers who cannot leave a shift, mail is the only practical way to cast a ballot. In 2025 and 2026, the infrastructure they depend on started coming apart from multiple directions.
- USPS postmark rule change Mail received the same day no longer guaranteed a same-day postmark. 2-3% of voters at risk.
- 3 states cut grace periods North Dakota, Ohio, and Utah stopped counting ballots that arrive after Election Day. A Kansas court blocked that state's repeal in July 2026.
- Trump mail voting EO EO 14399 requires states to submit voter lists to USPS 60 days before elections. USPS creates unique ballot identifiers.
- USPS ballot-mail rule proposed Would require state voter-list uploads, redesigned envelopes, and coded barcodes, or ballots could be refused. Finalized Aug 26.
- Supreme Court upholds grace periods Watson v. RNC, 5-4: states may count ballots postmarked by Election Day that arrive later.
- DHS monitoring begins DHS begins monitoring mail ballot flows. States can access federal citizenship data.
- Courts block the USPS rule A federal judge blocked it Sept 4; the Supreme Court refused to let it take effect Sept 14.
: Dec 2025: USPS postmark rule change (Mail received the same day no longer guaranteed a same-day postmark. 2-3% of voters at risk.). 2025: 3 states cut grace periods (North Dakota, Ohio, and Utah stopped counting ballots that arrive after Election Day. A Kansas court blocked that state's repeal in July 2026.). Mar 2026: Trump mail voting EO (EO 14399 requires states to submit voter lists to USPS 60 days before elections. USPS creates unique ballot identifiers.). Jun 2026: USPS ballot-mail rule proposed (Would require state voter-list uploads, redesigned envelopes, and coded barcodes, or ballots could be refused. Finalized Aug 26.). Jun 2026: Supreme Court upholds grace periods (Watson v. RNC, 5-4: states may count ballots postmarked by Election Day that arrive later.). Jun 2026: DHS monitoring begins (DHS begins monitoring mail ballot flows. States can access federal citizenship data.). Sep 2026: Courts block the USPS rule (A federal judge blocked it Sept 4; the Supreme Court refused to let it take effect Sept 14.).
In December 2025, USPS quietly removed the guarantee that mail received the same day would get a same-day postmark. That matters because 15 states plus DC accept ballots that arrive after Election Day if they are postmarked on time. Without a reliable postmark, ballots that arrive a day late get thrown out even if the voter mailed them before the deadline.
In 2025, three states eliminated their grace periods: North Dakota, Ohio, and Utah all accepted late-arriving ballots in 2024 and no longer do. Kansas passed a repeal too, but a state court blocked it in July 2026, so Kansas still counts ballots that arrive up to three days late.
Then came the federal moves. Trump's March 2026 executive order requires states to send voter lists to USPS, which would assign unique bar codes to ballot envelopes and only deliver ballots to voters on the approved list. Five state attorneys general sued immediately. Three courts had already blocked an earlier version of the order.
The USPS ballot-mail rule, proposed June 2 and finalized August 26, would have completed the shift: the postal service would move from carrying ballots to verifying them, and could refuse ballots that did not meet its new requirements. A federal judge blocked it on September 4, and on September 14 the Supreme Court refused to let it take effect before November. The case over its future continues. Our mail-in voting guide has every state's deadline.
AI Agents Replaced Bots and No Law Covers Them
In March 2026, researchers at USC proved that AI agents can coordinate propaganda campaigns without any human involvement. The agents wrote their own posts, learned which messages performed best, copied each other's successful approaches, and manufactured the appearance of consensus. No one was directing them. They were given an objective and they ran.
The bots that flooded social media in 2020 and 2024 were scripts. They repeated pre-written messages on a schedule. Platforms learned to spot them by their mechanical patterns: identical comments, fixed posting intervals, no variation in tone. Facebook deleted 3.3 billion fake accounts in 2023. TikTok removed 120 million. Platforms knew what to look for.
AI agents do not leave those patterns. They generate original text, vary their tone, and adapt in real time. The detection methods that caught bots cannot catch agents.
| Script-Based Bots (2020-2024) | AI Agents (2026) | |
|---|---|---|
| Content | Pre-written messages, repeated identically | Generates original content tailored to each account |
| Adaptation | Cannot adjust to platform changes | Learns what works and shifts strategy automatically |
| Coordination | Fixed instructions from a human operator | Autonomous coordination, no human in the loop |
| Detection | Easy: uniform patterns, mechanical timing | Text detection no longer viable (Rolli AI, 2026) |
| Scale | 45 accounts generated 4B views on X | Thousands of actions per second at machine speed |
Source: USC Thomas Lord Department (March 2026), Conbersa AI, Global Witness
The shift matters because detection methods that worked against bots do not work against agents. Researchers at Rolli AI concluded in 2026 that text-level detection of AI-generated content is no longer viable. The only remaining detection method is behavioral: looking for coordination patterns, velocity signatures, and near-simultaneous activation across accounts. That requires resources. CISA, the federal agency responsible for election security, lost $700 million in budget cuts for FY2027.
Voter fraud is rampant and requires aggressive federal intervention.
The Heritage Foundation, which actively seeks fraud cases, found 24 confirmed instances of noncitizen voting across 20 years. The rate is 0.0003%. The DOJ sued 30 states for voter data and 8 cases have already been dismissed by courts.
Brennan Center / Heritage FoundationThe fraud narrative does real work even when it is false. It justifies proof-of-citizenship laws like Florida's HB 991, which requires a passport or birth certificate to register. It justifies the DOJ suing 30 states for voter data. It justifies DHS monitoring mail ballots. When bots and AI agents amplify the narrative, it becomes the background noise that shapes how millions of people think about whether elections are legitimate.
During Trump's first impeachment, bots made up less than 1% of users but produced 30% of the content. QAnon supporters had 10x greater bot prevalence than normal accounts. 20% of social media chatter during major political events comes from bots. The point is volume, not persuasion. Flood the zone with enough noise and people stop trusting anything they read.
There are zero federal laws requiring disclosure of AI-generated political content. Twenty-six states have passed deepfake laws. Twenty-four have no protections at all. Three California laws were struck down on First Amendment grounds. The disinformation creates the political cover. The lawsuits do the structural damage.
90 Lawsuits Before a Single Ballot Is Cast
The 2026 election is being shaped in courtrooms months before voters reach polling places. Democracy Docket tracks nearly 90 election-related cases pending as of April 2026. The DOJ alone sued 29 states plus DC for voter registration data. Sixteen states handed it over. Eight cases were dismissed. The rest are still being fought.
- DOJ seizes Fulton County ballots 600+ boxes of 2020 ballots (500,000 voters) taken by FBI. Georgia officials criticized the seizure.
- Trump issues mail voting EO EO 14399 challenged immediately. Three courts had already blocked an earlier version.
- 5 AGs sue over mail voting EO Pennsylvania, California, Massachusetts, Nevada, and Washington file suit.
- Common Cause sues DOJ 16 states + DC challenge DOJ national voter database. Motion for partial summary judgment filed.
- 8 DOJ cases dismissed Courts in DC, AZ, CA, ME, MA, MI, OK, OR, RI, and WI rejected the voter data demands.
: Jan 2026: DOJ seizes Fulton County ballots (600+ boxes of 2020 ballots (500,000 voters) taken by FBI. Georgia officials criticized the seizure.). Mar 2026: Trump issues mail voting EO (EO 14399 challenged immediately. Three courts had already blocked an earlier version.). Apr 2026: 5 AGs sue over mail voting EO (Pennsylvania, California, Massachusetts, Nevada, and Washington file suit.). May 2026: Common Cause sues DOJ (16 states + DC challenge DOJ national voter database. Motion for partial summary judgment filed.). Jun 2026: 8 DOJ cases dismissed (Courts in DC, AZ, CA, ME, MA, MI, OK, OR, RI, and WI rejected the voter data demands.).
Two Supreme Court rulings this year set the rules for November. In Louisiana v. Callais, decided 6-3 on April 29, the Court required anyone challenging a map under the Voting Rights Act to prove the state meant to discriminate, and several states redrew their districts within weeks. In Watson v. RNC, decided 5-4 on June 29, the Court ruled that federal law does not require mail ballots to arrive by Election Day, so states with grace periods can keep counting ballots postmarked on time.
The money flowing into these races is equally unprecedented. $1.9 billion in dark money shaped the 2024 federal elections. MAGA Inc. raised $305 million since November 2024, with $88 million from a single 501(c)(4) that does not disclose donors. The four biggest congressional super PACs raised $71 million in dark money in 2025 alone.
- Source Identities shielded by 501(c)(4) status ↓ $88M to Securing American Greatness
- 501(c)(4) No donor disclosure required ↓ Funds transferred to super PAC
- Super PAC $305M raised since Nov 2024, 96% from $1M+ donors ↓ Spent on ads, mailers, digital
- Outcome Voters see the ads. They do not see the donors.
Sources: CBS News; Brennan Center; Issue One.
How Dark Money Reaches 2026 Races: undefined (Identities shielded by 501(c)(4) status), $88M to Securing American Greatness, undefined (No donor disclosure required), Funds transferred to super PAC, undefined ($305M raised since Nov 2024, 96% from $1M+ donors), Spent on ads, mailers, digital, undefined (Voters see the ads. They do not see the donors.)
Student IDs Banned, Workers Quitting, Polls Under Threat
These barriers hit some voters harder than others. Young voters face the widest turnout gap of any age group. Election workers are quitting faster than jurisdictions can hire. Voters in majority-Black communities face physical intimidation at polling places.
| Category | Value |
|---|---|
| Presidential 2024 (18-29 vs 65+) | pt gap / %33 |
| Midterm 2022 (18-29 vs 65+) | pt gap / %42 |
| Average midterm registration (18-29) | pt gap / %30 |
Youth voters trail older voters by 33 points in presidential years and 42 points in midterms. Average midterm registration for 18-29 is under 30%. Source: CIRCLE, Census Bureau.
The 42-point midterm gap is the number that matters for November 2026. In the 2022 midterms, 23% of 18-29 year olds voted compared to 65% of voters over 65. Eight million Americans became newly eligible to vote since the last midterm. Most of them are young, and most of them do not have the identification that seven states now require.
Seven states ban student IDs for voting. Young voters are twice as likely as older voters to lack the specific ID their state demands. In Indiana, SEA 10 banned student IDs for 40,000 Indiana University students. A court blocked the law before the 2024 election, but the legislature passed a new version in 2025.
But when access exists, young voters use it. In 2020, youth turnout hit a record 50%. In 2022, 63% of young voters chose Democratic candidates. The turnout gap tracks barriers, not motivation.
| Period | Value |
|---|---|
| Before 2020 | Stable workforce |
| Since 2020 | 36% turnover |
The people who run elections are quitting. More than a third of the election workforce has turned over since 2020. Nearly a third report threats or harassment. The NAACP Legal Defense Fund documented what this looks like on the ground in seven states during the 2024 election.
In Georgia, bomb threats closed 13 polling locations, many in majority-Black communities. In Florida, a man threatened voters with a machete. In Alabama, law enforcement set up a speed trap outside a predominantly Black polling location in the final hour before polls closed. Multiple voters were pulled over on their way to vote. In Texas and South Carolina, election workers were threatened and assaulted after asking voters to remove partisan apparel.
Disinformation targeting Black online spaces reached more than 440 million people before the 2024 election. The NAACP LDF report covered seven states: South Carolina, Georgia, Florida, Alabama, Mississippi, Louisiana, and Texas. In every state, voters encountered polling location changes with little notice, equipment failures, and inaccessible voting sites.
13 Ballot Measures Won, 8 Lawsuits Dismissed
Courts dismissed 8 of the DOJ's 30 voter data lawsuits. Three courts blocked Trump's first mail voting executive order, and the Supreme Court kept the Postal Service's ballot rule from taking effect this November. Abortion rights won 13 of the 16 ballot measures held in 2022 and 2024. The barriers are real, and so are the wins.
2026 Ballot Measures to Watch
Voters have sided with abortion rights on most ballot measures since Dobbs. The side supporting abortion rights won all 6 measures in 2022 and 7 of 10 in 2024. Florida's measure drew 57% but missed the state's 60% threshold, and Nebraska and South Dakota voters rejected protections. Nevada and Missouri both have measures on the 2026 ballot.
| Category | Value |
|---|---|
| 2022: won 6 of 6 | measures6 |
| 2024: won 7 of 10 | measures7 |
| 2026: 2 on the ballot | measures2 |
Bars count measures won by the side supporting abortion rights. Nevada (Question 6) and Missouri (Amendment 3 repeal) are on the 2026 ballot. Source: Ballot.org, Reproductive Freedom for All.
Missouri voters approved reproductive rights in 2024. The legislature responded by putting Amendment 3 on the 2026 ballot to repeal what voters chose. The measure also bans gender-affirming care for minors, bundling an anti-trans provision with the repeal to split the electorate. If the repeal passes, any state legislature can override a ballot initiative within a year of passage.
South Dakota's supermajority measure works differently. If passed, it would require 60% approval for any future constitutional amendment. At least four other states have similar measures. A 60% threshold would have blocked every citizen-initiated amendment in the past decade.
California's Prop 50 passed with 56% in November 2025, the first state to mid-decade redistrict in response to GOP map manipulation. Virginia approved a redistricting amendment in an April 2026 special election. Both are defensive, and both are working.
Eight States Where the Next Two Years Get Decided
Ballot measures and court wins prove the system can be defended. The question is where the fights matter most. Every House seat and 35 Senate seats are on the ballot. Thirty-six governor races. Eighty-eight of 99 state legislative chambers. The outcomes that determine national direction will come from a handful of states with governor or Senate races on the ballot.
Eight States With Governor or Senate Races in 2026
- 435
- House seats on the ballot
- 35
- Senate seats
- 36
- governor races
- 19
- open governor seats (no incumbent)
The scale of this election means the scale of the response has to match it. Voting is not enough. The barriers documented above are designed to make voting harder. Overcoming them takes preparation, and it takes pressure on the people who make the rules.
What You Can Do Before November
- Check your registration now. Voter rolls are being purged in multiple states. Do not assume your 2024 registration is still active. Verify your registration at Vote.org and check your assigned polling place, which may have changed.
- If you vote by mail, mail early. Your ballot may not get a same-day postmark, so mail it at least a week before the deadline. In 35 states it must arrive by Election Day, including North Dakota, Ohio, and Utah, which dropped their grace periods in 2025. Check your state's deadline.
- Know what to do if you see intimidation. Save the Election Protection hotline, 866-OUR-VOTE (866-687-8683), and check your state's rules on guns and campaigning at the polls in our voter intimidation guide.
- Learn what is on your ballot. Find your state page for local races, ballot measures, and voting rules that apply to you. Many of the most consequential races are for state legislature, not Congress.
- Become a poll worker. 48% of jurisdictions have difficulty recruiting. Election workers are the infrastructure that keeps polls open. Sign up at Power the Polls.
- Tell your representatives to protect voting access. The SAVE Act, DOJ voter data grabs, and the USPS gatekeeper rule all require congressional action to stop. Use the letter below to contact your senators and representative.
- Check registration
- Primaries and runoffs
- Sept. registration deadlines begin
- Early voting opens in most states
- Election Day
- New Congress convenes
: Now: Check registration. Summer: Primaries and runoffs. Sep 4: Sept. registration deadlines begin. Oct: Early voting opens in most states. Nov 3: Election Day. Jan 3, 2027: New Congress convenes.