Who Runs Your State
Your governor, AG, and state court control more of your daily life than Congress. In 2025, state legislatures enacted 29,000 laws. Congress enacted 72.
How Many Laws Your State Passes vs. Congress
In 2025, state legislatures across the country enacted roughly 29,000 laws. Congress enacted 72. That is a 400-to-1 ratio. The bills that decide your healthcare, your school funding, your voting rules, and your district maps are written in your state capitol.
| Category | Value |
|---|---|
| Congress (72) | 72 |
| State Legislatures (29,000) | 29000 |
Congress enacted 72 laws in the 2025 session. State legislatures enacted roughly 29,000. Data: National Archives (119th Congress first session), FiscalNote 2025 State Sessions Recap.
- 72
- laws enacted by Congress in 2025
- 29,000
- laws enacted by state legislatures
- 400:1
- ratio of state laws to federal
The federal government sets the floor. States decide whether to build above it or dig beneath it. Your state legislature decided whether your state expanded Medicaid, whether your public schools lost funding to vouchers, whether your district maps were fair, and whether your AG challenged federal overreach.
Congress debated those same topics. Your state acted on them.
Abortion Access Depends on Your State
The clearest proof is abortion. The same Dobbs ruling produced opposite outcomes from one state to the next, set entirely by who held power in the statehouse when it dropped. The divide is sharpest at a state line, where a near-total ban can sit a mile from a clinic that still operates.
How Each State Answered Dobbs
- Banned (near-total)
- Banned at about 6 weeks
- Legal, with a gestational limit
- Legal and protected
Sources: Guttmacher Institute; KFF; Center for Reproductive Rights.
| State | Status | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Alabama | Near-total ban | Near-total ban; life exception only. |
| Alaska | Legal and protected | Legal; no gestational limit. |
| Arizona | Legal and protected | Protected to viability (Prop 139, 2024). |
| Arkansas | Near-total ban | Near-total ban; life exception only. |
| California | Legal and protected | Constitutional protection; legal. |
| Colorado | Legal and protected | Constitutional protection (Amendment 79, 2024). |
| Connecticut | Legal and protected | Legal; protected by statute. |
| Delaware | Legal and protected | Legal; protected by statute. |
| District of Columbia | Legal and protected | Legal; no gestational limit. |
| Florida | Banned at about 6 weeks | Banned at about 6 weeks (2024). |
| Georgia | Banned at about 6 weeks | Banned at about 6 weeks (LIFE Act). |
| Hawaii | Legal with a gestational limit | Legal to viability. |
| Idaho | Near-total ban | Near-total ban; narrow exceptions. |
| Illinois | Legal and protected | Legal to viability; protected by statute. |
| Indiana | Near-total ban | Near-total ban; limited exceptions. |
| Iowa | Banned at about 6 weeks | Banned at about 6 weeks (2024). |
| Kansas | Legal with a gestational limit | Legal; in 2022 voters rejected an amendment that would have removed the state constitution's abortion protection. Restrictions apply. |
| Kentucky | Near-total ban | Near-total ban; narrow exceptions. |
| Louisiana | Near-total ban | Near-total ban; limited exceptions. |
| Maine | Legal and protected | Legal; broadly protected. |
| Maryland | Legal and protected | Constitutional protection (2024). |
| Massachusetts | Legal with a gestational limit | Legal to 24 weeks. |
| Michigan | Legal and protected | Constitutional protection (2022). |
| Minnesota | Legal and protected | Legal; protected by statute (2023). |
| Mississippi | Near-total ban | Near-total ban; the state in the Dobbs case. |
| Missouri | Legal and protected | Legal to fetal viability under the 2024 Amendment 3. A new Amendment 3 on the November 2026 ballot would repeal it. |
| Montana | Legal and protected | Protected to viability (2024 ballot). |
| Nebraska | Legal with a gestational limit | Banned at 12 weeks. |
| Nevada | Legal with a gestational limit | Legal to 24 weeks; 2024 measure must pass again in 2026. |
| New Hampshire | Legal with a gestational limit | Legal to 24 weeks. |
| New Jersey | Legal and protected | Legal; no gestational limit. |
| New Mexico | Legal and protected | Legal at all stages. |
| New York | Legal and protected | Constitutional equal-rights protection (2024). |
| North Carolina | Legal with a gestational limit | Banned at 12 weeks. |
| North Dakota | Near-total ban | Near-total ban, back in effect after the state Supreme Court upheld it on November 21, 2025. |
| Ohio | Legal and protected | Constitutional protection (Issue 1, 2023). |
| Oklahoma | Near-total ban | Near-total ban; life exception only. |
| Oregon | Legal and protected | Legal; no gestational limit. |
| Pennsylvania | Legal with a gestational limit | Legal to 24 weeks. |
| Rhode Island | Legal with a gestational limit | Legal to viability; protected by statute. |
| South Carolina | Banned at about 6 weeks | Banned at about 6 weeks. |
| South Dakota | Near-total ban | Near-total ban; life exception only. |
| Tennessee | Near-total ban | Near-total ban; limited exceptions. |
| Texas | Near-total ban | Near-total ban; no rape or incest exception. |
| Utah | Legal with a gestational limit | Banned at 18 weeks. |
| Vermont | Legal and protected | Constitutional protection; no gestational limit. |
| Virginia | Legal with a gestational limit | Legal into the third trimester; the only Southern state without a ban or early limit. |
| Washington | Legal and protected | Legal; protected by statute. |
| West Virginia | Near-total ban | Near-total ban; limited exceptions. |
| Wisconsin | Legal with a gestational limit | Banned at 20 weeks after fertilization, which is 22 weeks counted from the last menstrual period. |
| Wyoming | Legal with a gestational limit | Legal to fetal viability. The state Supreme Court struck the total ban on January 6, 2026, and a district court blocked a new six-week ban on April 24, 2026. KFF's ban map dated August 10, 2026 still lists the six-week ban; its telehealth table (May 14, 2026) and the Center for Reproductive Rights show it enjoined. |
Medicaid Funding Your Governor Refused
The federal government covers 90% of Medicaid expansion costs. States pay 10 cents on the dollar. Ten states still refuse the money. That refusal leaves $39 billion per year on the table and 1.4 million people in the coverage gap.
| Category | Value |
|---|---|
| Texas | $15.6B |
| Florida | $7.8B |
| Georgia | $4.7B |
| Tennessee | $3.1B |
| South Carolina | $2.8B |
| Alabama | $2.3B |
| Mississippi | $1.9B |
| Kansas | $0.624B |
| Wyoming | $0.234B |
Texas alone leaves $15.6B on the table annually, keeping 1 million Texans in the coverage gap. The federal government covers 90% of expansion costs. These governors chose to reject that money. Data: KFF, Georgetown CCF.
- $39B/yr
- federal funds refused by 10 non-expansion states
- 1.4M
- people in the coverage gap
- 90%
- federal match rate (states pay only 10%)
In non-expansion states, adults earning below 138% of the poverty line make too much for traditional Medicaid but too little for marketplace subsidies. They fall into a gap that exists only because their governor and legislature chose to create it. The cost per person in that gap is $15,600 per year in refused federal funds.
Rural hospitals absorb the consequences. Since 2010, 136 rural hospitals have closed nationwide. The closure rate in non-expansion states runs more than double the rate in expansion states. When the hospital closes, the nearest ER might be 45 minutes away.
Governor Abbott could accept $15.6 billion in federal Medicaid funds tomorrow. He refuses. One million Texans stay in the gap. That is a policy choice made by one person whose seat is on the ballot.
What Voucher Programs Cost Public Schools
Arizona's universal voucher program was budgeted at $65 million. It cost $900 million. The state auditor found 76% of voucher recipients were already enrolled in private school. The program did not create new opportunity. It subsidized families who had already opted out.
| Category | Value |
|---|---|
| Texas (2026-27 cap) | $1000M |
| Arizona | $900M |
| Florida | $608M |
| Indiana | $497M |
Arizona budgeted $65M and spent $900M. Indiana's program grew 796% since 2013 to $497M (76K students). Texas signed a $1B program in May 2025 that launches in the 2026-27 school year. Data: State education budget offices, AZ Auditor General, Texas Tribune.
| Public School | Voucher | |
|---|---|---|
| Per-pupil funding trend | Down 1.5% | Up 796% (Indiana since 2013) |
| Accountability | State testing, public board, open records | None required in most states |
| Must accept all students | Yes | No |
| Approved spending | Textbooks, teachers, facilities | Ninja warrior, trampoline parks, ski passes |
Per-pupil public school funding fell 1.5% while Indiana voucher spending grew 796%. Voucher schools face no testing, no audits, and no civil rights requirements. Arizona families used voucher funds for ninja warrior training, trampoline parks, and ski passes. Data: NCES, AZ Auditor General, Education Week.
- $300K
- drained per public school on average
- 76%
- of AZ recipients already in private school
- $1B
- Texas voucher program signed May 2025, launching 2026-27
For every student who leaves with a voucher, the public school loses funding but keeps the same building, the same bus route, the same heating bill. The per-school loss averages $300,000. Rural districts with one elementary school cannot absorb that cut.
Indiana's voucher program grew 796% since 2013 to $497 million for 76,000 students. Per-pupil public school funding dropped 1.5% over the same period. The money moved. The accountability did not.
Governor Abbott signed a $1 billion Texas voucher program in May 2025, and it launches in the 2026-27 school year. DeSantis already spent $608 million in Florida. Every one of these programs was sold as a modest pilot. Every one exploded past projections because families already paying private tuition claimed the benefit.
State AGs Who Sued & Won
Democratic attorneys general filed 100 lawsuits against federal actions through March 2026. They won 80% of cases ruled on in 2025: 40 wins out of 51 decisions. The return on investment was roughly 1,000 to 1. About $100 million in legal spending protected more than $100 billion in federal funding and constitutional rights.
- 100
- lawsuits filed through March 2026
- 80%
- win rate (40 of 51 cases ruled on)
- ~1000:1
- ROI ($100M spent, $100B+ protected)
| Category | Value |
|---|---|
| California (Bonta) | 67 |
| New York (James) | 22 |
| Connecticut (Tong) | 15 |
| Massachusetts (Campbell) | 13 |
| Washington (Ferguson/Choi) | 12 |
California AG Rob Bonta filed or joined 67 lawsuits. New York AG Letitia James led a 22-state coalition that blocked the birthright citizenship order. Connecticut AG William Tong won the Section 122 tariff lawsuit, saving households $1,300 each. Data: State AG offices, Reuters litigation tracker.
| AG Bonta (CA) | AG Paxton (TX) | |
|---|---|---|
| Lawsuits filed | 67 (challenging federal overreach) | 100 vs Biden ($6.1M spent) |
| Win rate | 80% | Impeached on 16 articles, acquitted |
| Result | $100B+ in rights protected | $271K plea on securities fraud |
| Next move | Defending Medicaid, VRA, climate | Running for U.S. Senate |
The AG office is the same in every state. The person who holds it decides whether your state fights federal overreach or enables it. Paxton spent $6.1M suing the Biden administration, was impeached on 16 articles, pleaded to securities fraud for $271K, and is now running for Senate. Data: State AG offices, Texas Tribune.
The five lawsuits with the largest impact: the birthright citizenship block (James, 22-state coalition), the Section 122 tariff challenge (Tong, saved $1,300 per household), the National Guard deployment block, the OMB spending directive freeze, and the gender education order injunction.
Texas AG Ken Paxton filed 100 lawsuits against the Biden administration at a cost of $6.1 million. He was impeached on 16 articles, acquitted by the Texas Senate, pleaded to securities fraud charges for $271,000, and is now running for U.S. Senate. The contrast between Bonta and Paxton is the entire argument for why AG races matter.
More than 30 AG seats are on the 2026 ballot. Most will get less media coverage than a single congressional primary. They will have more impact on your life than the entire House freshman class combined.
State Courts & Redistricting on the Ballot
Sixty-four to 65 state supreme court seats are on the ballot in 32 states in 2026. On April 29, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled 6-3 in Louisiana v. Callais that a map challenge under Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act must prove the state intended to discriminate. The fight for fair maps now runs mostly through state courts.
| Category | Value |
|---|---|
| Pennsylvania (3 retention) | 3 |
| Texas (3 seats, 9-0 R) | 3 |
| North Carolina (1 seat) | 1 |
| Michigan | 2 |
| Ohio | 2 |
Pennsylvania has 3 retention seats on the ballot. If 2 justices are ousted, the court deadlocks. North Carolina's 1 seat could shift the court to 6-1 Republican. Texas has 3 seats on an already 9-0 Republican court. Data: Brennan Center, Ballotpedia.
Wisconsin proves the model. 2023: $51M race, Protasiewicz won, maps redrawn. 2025: $100M race, Crawford won by 10 points (Elon Musk spent $20M+ on the losing side). 2026: Taylor won 58-42, expanding the liberal majority to 5-2. Three elections. The entire state changed direction. Source: Brennan Center.
- 64-65
- supreme court seats on 2026 ballots in 32 states
- 6-3
- Callais ruling requires proof of intent under the VRA (April 29)
After Callais, a federal challenge under the Voting Rights Act must prove a state meant to discriminate, a burden few map cases can meet. Communities of color trying to fight discriminatory maps now turn mostly to state courts. The judges on your ballot in November will decide whether your district maps are fair for the next decade.
Wisconsin showed what one court race can do. In 2023, a $51 million race flipped the court and led to maps being redrawn within weeks. In 2025, the race cost $100 million. Elon Musk spent more than $20 million on his preferred candidate. That candidate lost. In April 2026, Taylor won 58-42, expanding the liberal majority to 5-2.
Pennsylvania is the most critical state for 2026 courts. Three justices face retention votes. If two are ousted, the court deadlocks. Judicial spending is accelerating: $100.8 million in 2021-22, $157.3 million in 2023-24, and on track to exceed that in 2026.
Who Draws Your District Lines
How those maps get drawn is itself a state choice. Where the legislature draws its own lines, the party in power can lock in its majority for a decade before a single vote is cast. A handful of states hand the job to an independent commission instead.
Redistricting Control by State
- Independent commission
- Commission of elected officials or their appointees
- Legislature, with an advisory or backup commission
- Nonpartisan process (Iowa)
- Partisan legislature draws its own
- Single at-large district
Congressional maps. Source: All About Redistricting, Loyola Law School, verified September 24, 2026.
| State | Who draws the map | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Alabama | The partisan legislature draws its own | — |
| Alaska | Single at-large district | One House seat, elected statewide. An independent board draws state legislative maps. |
| Arizona | Independent commission | Created by ballot measure (2000). |
| Arkansas | The partisan legislature draws its own | — |
| California | Independent commission | Created by ballot measure (2008/2010). The Brennan Center found that the independent commissions in Arizona, California, Colorado and Michigan drew 19% of congressional districts but 41% of 2024 toss-up districts. Proposition 50 (November 2025) replaced the commission map with a legislature-drawn map for the 2026 cycle. |
| Colorado | Independent commission | Created by ballot measure (2018). 4 Dem + 4 Rep + 4 no party. 21 hearings, 5,000+ public comments. |
| Connecticut | The legislature, with an advisory or backup commission | The legislature needs a two-thirds vote; a backup commission draws the map if it fails. |
| Delaware | Single at-large district | — |
| District of Columbia | Single at-large district | — |
| Florida | The partisan legislature draws its own | — |
| Georgia | The partisan legislature draws its own | — |
| Hawaii | Commission of elected officials or their appointees | A reapportionment commission chosen by legislative leaders draws the map. |
| Idaho | Independent commission | Bipartisan commission. 3 appointed by each party. |
| Illinois | The partisan legislature draws its own | The legislature draws the congressional map. Its backup commission covers state legislative maps only. |
| Indiana | The legislature, with an advisory or backup commission | The legislature draws the map, with a backup commission if it fails. |
| Iowa | Nonpartisan agency (Iowa) | Nonpartisan legislative staff draw maps without political data. Legislature votes yes or no. |
| Kansas | The partisan legislature draws its own | — |
| Kentucky | The partisan legislature draws its own | — |
| Louisiana | The partisan legislature draws its own | — |
| Maine | The legislature, with an advisory or backup commission | An advisory commission proposes a plan; the legislature needs a two-thirds vote. |
| Maryland | The legislature, with an advisory or backup commission | An advisory committee helps the governor draft a plan; the legislature decides. |
| Massachusetts | The partisan legislature draws its own | — |
| Michigan | Independent commission | Created by ballot measure (2018). 4 Dem + 4 Rep + 5 unaffiliated. |
| Minnesota | The partisan legislature draws its own | Courts frequently intervene when legislature deadlocks |
| Mississippi | The partisan legislature draws its own | The legislature draws the congressional map. Its backup commission covers state legislative maps only. |
| Missouri | The partisan legislature draws its own | Has bipartisan commission language but congressional maps drawn by legislature in practice |
| Montana | Independent commission | Districting and Apportionment Commission. Bipartisan with independent chair. |
| Nebraska | The partisan legislature draws its own | — |
| Nevada | The partisan legislature draws its own | — |
| New Hampshire | The partisan legislature draws its own | — |
| New Jersey | Commission of elected officials or their appointees | A commission named by party leaders, with a tiebreaker, draws the map. |
| New Mexico | The partisan legislature draws its own | — |
| New York | Independent commission | Independent commission. The legislature can override it by a supermajority. |
| North Carolina | The partisan legislature draws its own | Among the most extreme gerrymanders. R+26 efficiency gap in 2024 map. |
| North Dakota | Single at-large district | One House seat, elected statewide. |
| Ohio | The legislature, with an advisory or backup commission | The legislature needs a bipartisan supermajority; if it fails, the Ohio Redistricting Commission of elected officials takes over. Courts repeatedly rejected maps in 2022. |
| Oklahoma | The partisan legislature draws its own | — |
| Oregon | The partisan legislature draws its own | — |
| Pennsylvania | The partisan legislature draws its own | The legislature draws the congressional map. A commission draws state legislative maps only. |
| Rhode Island | The partisan legislature draws its own | — |
| South Carolina | The partisan legislature draws its own | — |
| South Dakota | Single at-large district | — |
| Tennessee | The partisan legislature draws its own | — |
| Texas | The partisan legislature draws its own | Legislative Redistricting Board as backup if legislature fails |
| Utah | The legislature, with an advisory or backup commission | An advisory commission created by ballot measure (2018) proposes maps. The legislature ignored them in 2021, and a court imposed a new map in 2025. |
| Vermont | Single at-large district | — |
| Virginia | Commission of elected officials or their appointees | A commission of 8 legislators and 8 citizens (2020 amendment). It deadlocked in 2021, and the state supreme court drew the map. |
| Washington | Independent commission | Bipartisan commission. 2 appointed by each party + nonvoting chair. |
| West Virginia | The partisan legislature draws its own | — |
| Wisconsin | The partisan legislature draws its own | Among the most gerrymandered states. Governor used veto to force court-drawn maps in 2024. |
| Wyoming | Single at-large district | — |
Every State Race in November 2026
November 2026 puts 6,279 or more state races on the ballot. Thirty-six governors, 30-plus AGs, 26 secretaries of state, 64-65 supreme court justices, and 6,122 state legislators. The typical American voter can name 1.3 of the 3 most important news stories happening right now. Most will not know who is on their state ballot until they see the names in the booth.
- 6,279+
- total state-level races on the 2026 ballot
- 36
- governor seats
- 30+
- attorney general races
- 6,122
- state legislative seats
| Presidential Year | Midterm Year | |
|---|---|---|
| Turnout rate | 66% | 46% |
| Missing voters | Baseline | 48M stayed home |
| News awareness | Higher (top of ticket drives attention) | 1.3 of 3 major stories known |
| State races decided by | Coattails | Who actually shows up |
48 million fewer Americans vote in midterms than in presidential years. State-level races that control Medicaid, vouchers, maps, and AG power are decided entirely by midterm turnout. Data: U.S. Elections Project, Census Bureau, Pew Research.
Of the 36 governor races on the ballot, 19 are open seats with no incumbent running, because 15 governors are term-limited, 3 are not seeking reelection and 1 lost a primary. The winners will control Medicaid, voucher funding, AG appointments in some states, and redistricting vetoes.
Four swing states have Democratic secretaries of state defending seats in Trump-won territory: Arizona, Michigan, Nevada, and Wisconsin. The secretary of state certifies your election results. If you watched 2020, you know what happens when that office is held by someone who does not believe in the process.
The 48 million voters who stayed home in 2022 did not lose their right to an opinion. They lost their say in who drew their maps, who ran their health program, who decided whether their kids' school kept its funding, and who their AG would be when federal overreach came knocking.
Total Cost of State Policy Failures
Add up what state policy failures actually cost. This is the annual bill for governors and legislatures who chose ideology over their own residents.
Governor Abbott's policy choices cost Texas $36 billion per year, $15.6 billion in refused Medicaid funds and $20.4 billion in abortion ban economic losses. The voucher program adds its first $1 billion when it launches in the 2026-27 school year.
Twenty-six states preempt local governments from setting their own minimum wages. The Economic Policy Institute estimates that costs workers $4,400 to $8,800 per household annually in suppressed wages. The state legislature overrides the city council. The governor signs the preemption. The worker pays the price.
Every dollar on this receipt traces back to a state official whose name appeared on a ballot. Most of them won their seats in midterm elections where fewer than half of eligible voters showed up.
Who Controls What
Every policy on this page traces to one official's choice. Every official is on your ballot.
| Policy | Who Decides | On Ballot? | Races to Watch |
|---|---|---|---|
| Medicaid expansion | Governor + Legislature | 36 governor races | AL, FL, GA, KS, SC, TN, TX, WI, WY (have not expanded Medicaid) |
| School vouchers | Governor + Legislature | 36 governor races | TX, AZ, FL |
| Abortion access | State Supreme Court | 64 court seats | PA (3 seats), NC (1), TX (3) |
| Fair district maps | State Supreme Court | 64 court seats | PA, NC, WI (already flipped) |
| Election rules | Secretary of State | 26 SoS races | AZ, MI, NV, WI |
| Federal overreach | Attorney General | 30 AG races | AL, CO, MI, NV, OH, OK, RI, SC, SD, TX (open seats, per Ballotpedia) |
| Local wages | State Legislature | 6,122 seats | MN (tied 67-67), MI, WI, ME |
Where Your Vote Matters Most
Alabama, Alaska, California, Colorado, Florida, Georgia, Iowa, Kansas, Maine, Michigan, Minnesota, New Mexico, Ohio, Oklahoma, Rhode Island, South Carolina, Tennessee, Wisconsin, Wyoming. No incumbent is on the ballot. These governors control Medicaid, vouchers, and redistricting vetoes.
Arizona, Michigan, Nevada, Wisconsin. Democrats defending in Trump-won states. These officials certify elections and set voting rules.
Pennsylvania (3 retention seats, could deadlock), North Carolina (1 seat, could go 6-1 R), Texas (3 seats on 9-0 R court). These judges decide redistricting and abortion.
Find your races: VOTE411 (full ballot by zip code) | Ballotpedia (every race, every state) | Your state page (our coverage + call scripts)
More in Who Runs Your State
Vote. And Bring Someone With You.
Letters and calls matter. But the numbers above prove something bigger: the people who control your healthcare, your schools, your maps, and your rights are on your state ballot. Not the federal one. The most powerful thing you can do is vote in every race on your ballot and make sure the people around you do the same.
48 million people stayed home in the last midterm. The margins in most state races are measured in thousands. Five percent of those missing voters would have shifted the balance in a dozen states.
- 1. Register now. Deadlines vary by state. Some close 30 days before November. Do it today at vote.org.
- 2. Research every race. Governor, AG, secretary of state, supreme court, state legislature. Use VOTE411 or Ballotpedia.
- 3. Don't skip judicial races. 64 supreme court seats on the ballot. One seat in Wisconsin changed the entire state.
- 4. Bring three people. Forward this page to three people who didn't vote last midterm. The margins are small. Your circle matters.
- 5. Find your state page at resistnow.net/states for your candidates, call scripts, and local actions.
- 6. Text RESIST to 50409 to contact your state legislators, governor, and AG in one message.